3D Modeling from High Resolution Site Characterization

New Optical Image Profiler Tools

OIP-UV Ultra-Violet

The OIP-UV tool was developed in 2016 for the detection of petroleum LNAPL, such as fuels or crude oils, which will fluoresce when exposed to a 275nm UV light source in the tool. During the advancement of the probe, images of the soil are taken through a sapphire window in the probe with a CMOS camera. The image color is then analyzed by the software for presence of fluorescing light color consistent with that of known petroleum types. The fluorescence is measured as the percentage of fluorescent area in the image, or Percent Area Fluorescence (%AF). Most recently, this OIP-UV tool has been combined with the Hydraulic Profile Tool (HPT).

OiHpt Combined OIP-UV and Hydraulic Profile Tool

The new combination OiHpt tool captures LNAPL UV fluorescence (%AF) and visible light images, HPT injection pressure/flow, estimated K, and EC soilmeasurements. Previously, to map the permeability pathways that LNAPL could migrate within required offsetting the OIP borehole with the HPT tool to obtain the hydraulic conductivity data. Now, these tools are combined in one tool and also include electrical conductivity (EC), cutting acquisition time, and cost, in half.

OIP-G Green Laser

The new OIP-G Green Laser system is designed for identifying the fluorescence of heavier PAHs, such as creosote or coal tar, was also just released in 2018.  Since heavier PAHs adsorb the shorter wavelength UV light, a longer wavelength excitation light is required, which causes stronger fluorescence of the PAHs in the yellow to red light wavelengths. An optical filter in the probe removes the shorter wavelengths interference, including the green light.   This allows us to see these heavier NAPLS that can even be found as solids petroleum compounds (often DNAPLS).  Soil texture can also be viewed by switching to the Infra-Red (IR) light source.

 

Vista Joins ITRC Teams

Vista joins ITRC Teams

Vista is a member of ITRC Industry Affiliates Program (IAP). We are always looking to be a key force in improving the use of innovative environmental technologies and processes. Associated teams are:

Implementing the Use of Advanced Site Characterizations Tools

Project: A number of advanced site characterization tools, which greatly expand the ability to understand contaminant concentration and mass, as well as increase the ability to understand the stratigraphy of the contaminated media (soil, rock), are available but underutilized. These tools can be broadly classified into analytical tools and geophysical tools. While some of these tools, as well as the core principles underlying newer variations of such tools, have been in existence for several years, advances in computing and supporting technologies have vastly improved data analysis, presentation, and user experience. The goal of this project is to meld existing guidance, primary literature, vendor literature and personal experience, illustrated by projects from the states, into a practical guide on the selection and application of advanced site characterization tools. The team will
address the selection, application, and integration of the tools into the project life-cycle of site characterization, remediation, monitoring, and closure.

Optimizing In Situ Remediation Performance & Injection Strategies

Project: In situ (on site) reagent injection-based remediation technologies have advanced to mainstream acceptance and offer a competitive advantage over many forms of ex situ treatment of soil and groundwater. However, detailed site-specific injection based strategies are absolutely critical to the success of such in situ treatment remedies. In the interest of expedited and cost effective solutions, many in-situ projects have been executed based on an incomplete understanding of the hydrogeology, geology, and contaminant distribution and mass. Many sites have undergone multiple rounds of in situ injections and not advanced to closure. Better strategies and minimum design standards are required to decrease uncertainty and improve outcomes. To concisely summarize the issues surrounding the topic, the team will create a guidance document on optimizing injection-based remediation technologies. The document will discuss risks and limitations on these technologies, and how to address them to improve remedial success.

3D Modeling HRSC

3-D Modeling for your Site Specific Investigations

[metaslider id=397]

Draft Field Logs can be printed on site, or e-mailed as PDFs when time permits, if cellular service is available.  A daily field report is submitted to the client’s on site representative for signature confirming site activities.

A post project Final Report will include the following at a minimum for each area:

  • Written summary of field activities
  • Daily Activity Reports
  • Color Graphic Logs printed in two scaling formats, including:
    • Electrical Conductivity
    • HPT Pressure & HPT Flow
    • Estimated K (if dissipation tests are performed)
    • MIP VOCs – FID, PID & XSD responses
    • Percent (OIP) Fluorescence and Select Images
  • Optionally – Excel or ASCII files of the data, or DI Viewer files.

The software records many other tool and logging parameters that can be optionally printed on logs such as rate of penetration, MIP temperature and flow, etc.  These values are preserved in the log file for later review is needed.

If sufficient data is present, an optional 3-D imaging report can be which may include:

  • Log plots in cross-section of selected sensor responses
  • Fence diagrams of selected sensor responses
  • 3-D Model diagrams of selected sensor responses
  • Integration and plotting of laboratory results with the above information